This is not something I consider a big deal...while I severely disliked my glasses as a kid (see below), that may well have been because I had some degree of taste, and objected to my mother's conviction that all little girls needed to wear glasses that were both GIGANTIC and PINK.

Nowadays, I have nifty black rectangular-ish frames that I love:

...and I can see quite well with them. And unlike contact lenses (which I wore for a while between the ages of 16 and 23), wearing them does not require sticking my fingers IN my eyes, and they're a fair sight more difficult to lose on the bathroom floor, which is always a bonus.
Anyway, while I am a very visually-oriented person and am relieved that my lens prescription hasn't changed very much over the past ten years or so, I can't say I've ever really seen my need for corrective lenses as a tragedy. Moreover, it has never really even occurred to me to obsess over why I might be nearsighted...heck, a fair percentage of people in my family are as well, so it's not like this was unprecedented. Overall, the whole thing rates in my mind as Not A Big Deal.
So, you can imagine my surprise at coming across MYOPIA.ORG this evening. I'd been searching for data on how much people's prescriptions tended to change on average at around my age (30), and I have to admit I've not even gone forward with that search since finding this bizarre site, just because I can't figure out whether to be amused or kind of horrified by it yet.
Essentially, this page reads like...well, I have to admit I wondered upon encountering it whether it might be a parody of one of those autism-related conspiracy-theory sites (in which everything from The Government to Cell Towers to Aborted Chicken Fetus Residue to French fries is implicated in autism causation, with an emphasis on What They Don't Want You To Know(TM)). Case in point:
There are many frauds in the world, engineered by greedy, unscrupulous people. Getting shoddy goods, or losing one's money entirely is common. But what about a situation where you lose your money and your most precious gift, your vision, at the same time? And what if this is happening to defenseless children in every country of the world?
Over one third of our children, although born with normal vision, become nearsighted during their school years. Many have vision that has deteriorated to the point where they would be declared legally blind if they did not have the crutch of glasses to turn to. In some highly literate Asian countries, the incidence of acquired myopia has been increasing in recent years to the point where over 90% of college students are nearsighted! The eye doctors claim this is hereditary, even when there is no history of the problem in the family. But, of all our senses, why is it just our vision that so rapidly deteriorates at such an early age? What if one third of our children walked around with hearing aids or crutches? Would that be considered just "inherited"? The excessive amount of reading and other close work that we do in our modern society is the REAL cause of acquired myopia. And the glasses with minus power lenses that are normally prescribed by uncaring doctors make the vision get worse FAST!
Are you concerned about what your children view on the Internet? You should be more concerned about HOW they are viewing it. If they are wearing the glasses normally prescribed for myopia, their vision will deteriorate. If you ignore the information on this site and fail to educate yourself, you are a partner with your eye doctor in creating a visually handicapped child. The expense and nuisance of wearing glasses for a lifetime is the least of the problem. The more myopia you have, the more you are at risk for sight-destroying diseases such as retinal detachment, macular degeneration, glaucoma and cataract!
During the last century, over 160 million human beings were slaughtered in warfare by other human beings. Compassion toward others is hardly a predominant human trait. This same lack of concern for others is also widespread in the business world. We all know how the tobacco industry does everything in its power to make our children into tobacco addicts so that they will become lifelong customers. The misery and death caused by this are of no concern. In a similar way, the eye "care" industry intentionally ignores prevention and makes our children into visual cripples so they will become lifelong customers. That the progression of myopia leads to eye disease and blindness is of no concern to these people. It's all about the money. This is The Biggest Consumer Fraud In History.
Wellllll...I am not even sure where to start here. Seriously, I had no idea this kind of bizarritude existed surrounding myopia of all things. But it gets better...from the same site, I give you, The Anti-Pinhole Conspiracy!
...pinhole glasses are a perfectly harmless device, even if exaggerated claims were being made. Exaggerated claims seem to be the rule in the marketing world. What would create such a massive coordinated attack against a small company selling such a harmless product? Do you smell the presence of the eye doctors and optical companies in the background as we do? Proof is difficult to find, but what other explanation is there? We are certain that if there was a way to make squinting illegal, they would try to do it. Isn't it strange that pinholes are not offered for sale in retail stores, where they could be made available without making any claims at all for them, just like off-the-rack reading glasses? The reason is that any attempt to mass distribute them has been deliberately and massively squashed.
OK. Here we get to the primary agenda of the myopia.org site: the pushing of "pinhole glasses", which are basically what they sound like: eye coverings dotted with many tiny pinholes. I've actually tried glasses like this (and even attempted making my own as a youngster after reading about the effect in a book), and yes, they do "work" in a sense. Impressively so, actually, at least as far as permitting some degree of clear distance-vision without the familiar curved transparent lenses as one finds in standard glasses. You can try it yourself if you want -- just get a piece of stiff paperboard and a pin, poke a bunch of holes in it, and look through. If you are nearsighted, you should see at least some distant objects far more clearly than you do without the pinhole surface.
Fine, I am not disputing that. But pinhole glasses also have limitations -- for one thing, they can reduce brightness significantly, and for another, they can interfere a lot with one's peripheral vision. When I tried my looking-through-holes experiment I found the effect interesting to be sure, but annoying as well, and in general far more limiting to my vision than conventional glasses. Would I try them again? Sure, perhaps, if I wanted a pair of eclectic sunglasses, or perhaps as a spare if I were going camping, but not likely otherwise.
Moreover, the myopia.org site seems to be pushing the rather silly notion that somehow myopia isn't genetic in origin, but (as the quote above indicates) the result of a conspiracy perpetuated by the "eye doctors and optical industry" who have banded together to suppress the "curative" or "preventative" pinhole lenses so they can continue filling their pockets with the money of those of us who have had our vision "destroyed" by all those years of reading and wearing regular glasses (the horror!).
Overall, I would definitely hold up myopia.org as a great example of what pseudoscientific nonsense looks like. While it does actually refer to a phenomenon (the fact that pinhole lenses can make stuff look clearer if you're myopic) that is certainly real enough, it goes into this big load of "Oh Look How We Are So Oppressed Even Though We Are Geniuses Who Know Better Than Actual Scientists!" drama-rama quite seamlessly. Then you've got the conspiracy-mongering. You've got the blaming (see intro paragraph quoted above) in which parents are called "...a partner with [their] eye doctor in creating a visually handicapped child" if they dare to "ignore" the information on their site. And then you have the invocation of the "glasses are ugly" ableist stereotype as a scare tactic:
But, when children have been adequately informed of what is at stake, will they really choose instead the inconvenience of a lifelong dependence on glasses to see and the increased probability of eye disease? Point out a few people with thick glasses and ask your child if it isn't worth a little effort to avoid needing such glasses to see.
Ew ew ew. This thing is a treasure trove, I tell you -- a treasure trove of ridiculousness!
And on that note, I am going to bed, so long as my "devastating" nearsightedness doesn't result in...exploding eyeballs or something on the way there!
References:
- myopia.org
- Quackwatch on Eye-Related Quackery





