I just finished reading the His Dark Materials trilogy by Philip Pullman. Nothern Lights/The Golden Compass is the first book in the trilogy; the second is The Subtle Knife and the third is The Amber Spyglass.
There will probably be further commentary on this series from me at some point, but I wanted to say a few things while I was thinking about them (in order to avoid getting bogged down trying to come up with some Huge Epic Post before even mentioning these books on my blog).
Firstly, the His Dark Materials books are most definitely going on my list of Highly Meaningful Fiction (a list which seems perhaps inordinately stuffed in my case with children's fantasy novels, but I firmly belive that there is often a lot more going on in this sort of book than people might think from looking at them in a cursory fashion). Other items on this list include Madeleine L'Engle's Time Quartet, in addition to Momo and The Neverending Story (both by Michael Ende). (Coraline by Neil Gaiman is also a more recent addition here).
Secondly, the reasons the His Dark Materials books are really, really good in my estimation have a lot to do with just how well they manage to subvert all kinds of dogmatic, institutional ideas and vocabularies. Vocabularies especially, as is evident from the first few pages of the first book, where we learn that humans in that universe have externally-visible, tangible, animal-shaped self/"soul" aspects called daemons.
Now, the word daemon goes back to ancient Greece, where it was used to denote a category of beings somewhere between men and gods, which could be either good or evil, and which served as guardians, intercessaries, etc. However when most modern Westerners see this word it is likely that they are reminded of demon -- those nasty spirits common in Judeo-Christian mythology that do things like possess people and make their heads spin and so forth. You absolutely have to be able to get past that association to see what Pullman is actually talking about in the His Dark Materials sequence, and my guess is that some people probably have a really hard time with that.
There are plenty of elements in these books that would be considered far more controversial than the use of "daemon" to describe a creature that is good rather than evil, but they all share the common characteristic of being called one thing, but not having their nature be at all obvious by the name.
In order to get at the nature of many things, in the books (as in real life to a large extent), you have to be able to look straightforwardly at their content. In the words of one Vorlon, you must "listen to the music, not the song". People might be called witches, or gods, or angels, or bears, or men, or little girls -- but none of these descriptors permit the easy application of predetermined definitions. You have to get to know each thing, and each person, on its/his/her own terms. Certainly you can try and avoid doing that, but you will miss out on so much if you do.
Philosophically, like Pullman, I am an unbeliever when it comes to the particular supernatural entities drawn up and described by humans (and I've yet to meet anything I'd describe as being "outside nature" or "beyond nature" even outside those particular descriptions). That does not stop me from enjoying books by authors like L'Engle who employ Christian vocabulary and themes. And I think that anyone who can manage to get to know the characters and landscapes in His Dark Materials is sure to be richly rewarded, no matter what their philosophical sentiments (though I suspect actual fundamentalists would find fault with L'Engle as much as with Pullman, for she could be quite subversive herself at times!).
The protagonists in His Dark Materials go through so much in the course of their respective journeys through space, time, conflict, and coming-of-age that the experience of reading the books is almost exhausting -- in a good way. These books were not afraid to go to very dark places, but neither did they sink into nihilism; while not everything turned out "ideal" (in the "If Anne Could Decide How Things Went" sense), things did go in directions I could very much respect.
If I had to describe these books in one phrase, that phrase would be "a celebration of reality". While certainly brimming with wild and fantastical adventures, creatures, and epic-scale wonders at every turn, the major theme winding its way through the entire narrative seemed to be one of deep sincere love for all that is truly real. As with the other books on my personal Meaningful Fiction List, His Dark Materials manages the feat of using language but at the same time going beyond language to make achingly beautiful statements about the world we actually live in.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


9 comments:
Wow, those sound fascinating. Which did you like best? Must they be read in any particular order?
Here's a few quotes found on-the-fly just after reading your commentary and the wiki:
"The body and mind must be mirrored universes - it is as if the mind were the clouds and the body were the lake. When you look into the body, you see a reflection of the mind, the way clouds appear in a clear pool on a sunny afternoon. Change the body.
Change the mind."
-Patricia Stacey, The Boy Who Loved Windows
"The mystical trend of our time, which shows itself particularly in the rampant growth of the so-called Theosophy and Spiritualism, is for me no more than a symptom of weakness and confusion. Since our inner experiences consist of reproductions, and combinations of sensory impressions, the concept of a soul without a body seem to me to be empty and devoid of meaning."
-Einstein
"If you want your children to be bright, teach them myths-- if you want them to be brilliant, teach them more myths."
-Einstein
"In a world which has become conscious of its own self
And provides its own motive force,
What is most vitally necessary to the thinking earth is a faith—
And a great faith-- and ever more faith.
To know that we are not prisoners.
To know that there is a way out,
That there is air, and light, and love,
Somewhere, beyond the reach of all death.
To know this, to know that it is neither an illusion nor a fairy story. –
That, if we are not to perish smothered in the very stuff of our being,
That is what we must at all costs secure.
And it is there that we find what I may well be so bold as to call the evolutionary role of religions."
- Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, Jesuit paleontologist, (1881-1955) (Chardin 1970, 9).
article link
Anderson: The books are in chronological order:
1. Northern Lights (The Golden Compass in the USA)
2. The Subtle Knife
3. The Amber Spyglass
I sort of view the series as one big book so it's hard to say which one was a "favorite".
Oh, and re. the second quote you posted: I'd agree with the sentiment aside from the "religions" part -- IMO, it makes more sense considering of the evolutionary role of stories (and also art).
Indeed, they are at the true heart of the matter.
Here's a comment that I just wrote for another article, but it does seem to apply here as well, whether indirectly or intimately:
"It can be very difficult to find clarity when attempting to attain absolute definitions while navigating the blurred lines between human nature and human conditioning. "Duality in man" is undoubtedly a concept that, despite an abundance of "evidence" to the contrary, keeps getting eclipsed by what is possibly the most profound of human traits, altruism.
Of course, it seems plausible that conditioning was a needed stepping stone on the path to uniting us towards our common goals, which includes expanding our horizons and living more symbiotically. With the challenges we face ahead, we're going to need to embrace these strengths and use them to the best of our abilities."
The trilogy is a damn good read; and although it's theoretically meant for children, I think adults will appreciate it more. I'm particularly fond of Pullman's ability to conjure up an Oxford which is close-but-not-quite-right . . .
Go Democrats: Indeed, I don't think I'd have been able to make head or tail of this series as a youngster, though I'd certainly have liked some of the concepts and imagery (I was utterly obsessed with anything to do with parallel worlds, multiple universes, traveling between them, etc.).
And, yes, the "not quite Oxford" was nicely done (though admittedly I've never been to Oxford, it was clear enough what was going on). I also utterly adored the daemon concept -- not just because it would be totally cool to have an animal-companion-that-is-also-somehow-part-of-you running around with you all the time, but because of how it was so interwoven into the culture and daily life of the characters. E.g., how to come across a human without a daemon was like coming across a person with no head or their ribs cracked open -- Pullman made really nice use of analogy in cases like that to convey how the characters felt and experienced their world.
Hi Anne. I am so glad I have subscribed to your blog (which looks great!) and get to read these wonderful posts.
I love the Dark Materials trilogy. I read them for the 1st time just few years back after buying them for my daughter, who also loves them. You have stirred up some wonderful thoughts and memories of the series.
I have been to Oxford; my husband grew up there so the description of the other Oxford is especially interesting.
I love the way the great betrayal was fortold and how it happened. I love the terminology, language and ideas.
Did you watch the film? Though it obviously can't compare, I did enjoy it up to a point. Apparatntly the play captured the magic and ethos of the book much better than the movie.
Hi Sharon,
I love the Dark Materials trilogy. I read them for the 1st time just few years back after buying them for my daughter, who also loves them. You have stirred up some wonderful thoughts and memories of the series.
Hehe, that's neat that both you and your daughter were able to enjoy these books. As noted in a prior comment, I don't think I'd have understood them when I was much younger but I'd probably have liked the imagery at least. I have always been a bit of a bookworm, especially for fantasy and science fiction. :)
I have been to Oxford; my husband grew up there so the description of the other Oxford is especially interesting.
Oh, neat. When I was little for a while I wanted to someday "go to Oxford and study physics". Things didn't turn out quite that way, but I'd like to see it someday, especially after reading His Dark Materials. (And I've got a number of relations in the UK as well, though I'm not sure exactly where they're all living these days.)
I love the way the great betrayal was fortold and how it happened. I love the terminology, language and ideas.
Yes, most definitely in agreement here. The way the story was told worked in little things here and there to make it clear when we were reading about a world like our own, but that was not exactly our own. It was fun figuring out what different terms meant; e.g., "anbaric", "sky iron", etc.
Did you watch the film? Though it obviously can't compare, I did enjoy it up to a point. Apparatntly the play captured the magic and ethos of the book much better than the movie.
Yes, I actually saw the film before reading any of the books. I liked the film (very pretty, and the bears were quite well done!), but the book was heaps better, far darker and a lot more complex. I've not seen the play but I can see that format working well for this story, though it seems like it would be more difficult to get the daemons right. I think the film might have actually worked better as something like a BBC miniseries (along the lines of Neil Gaiman's "Neverwhere").
It's sort of odd to me how people can put all sorts of interesting, intelligent things in books nominally geared toward children and teenagers, but the moment they go to make a major film, everyone gets all worried about marketing and making the movie palatable for a mass audience. There was a bit pertaining to Iorek Byrnison in the movie that was different from the book in a very annoying, "But wait, Han shot first!" way that just made me want to roll my eyes (I only noticed this the other day, as I re-watched the DVD while I was folding laundry).
Post a Comment