When I was in college, I had a roommate who initially seemed incredibly standoffish. I'm not always great at picking up on that sort of thing, and for a few weeks I sort of shrugged it off and figured she was just "quiet" or "shy".
After all, I'd been accused plenty of times of being unfriendly myself, and I wasn't about to do that to someone else! I felt proud of myself for "not taking it personally".
Somehow, though I eventually figured out that her demeanor did have something to do with me. I can't even remember how -- possibly seeing how different she was around people who weren't me -- but in any case, I confronted her one day.
Given my history of social ostracism and exclusion, I initially thought I was going to hear something about how I was weird, or annoying, or even "scary". I braced myself for "the usual".
I didn't get "the usual". Instead, I got an admission that I made her nervous because I was white.
This completely shocked me. I sputtered something like, "But I'm not racist! Why would you even think that?"
I don't remember what my roommate said in response, or how that conversation eventually resolved -- but nevertheless, things were much better afterward. We actually ended up getting along quite well for the rest of the time we shared a room. Still, though, it wasn't until several years after graduating that I was able to see the illusory nature of my moral high horse.
For years, I'd seen the positive resolution of our little discussion on race as being a concession on her part that she'd been wrong in her initial uneasiness about sharing a room with a white girl. However, having since learned a lot more about the utterly horrific levels of racism, stereotyping, and general disrespect women of color (in this case, Latina) still experience in our "post-Enlightenment" society, I can now see why my roommate reacted to me the way she did in the beginning.
I can also see how my initial (and held-for-years) perception of our resolution and subsequent peaceful coexistence was, in fact, a consequence of my own unexamined privilege and ignorance.
My mistake had been in presuming that my roommate and I were actually on a level playing field to begin with as far as our backgrounds went -- meaning that (in my mind, at the time) her reaction had been "paranoid" until she'd gotten a clue, whereas mine had been "reasoned".
If that wasn't a privileged assumption on my part, I don't know what is.
My roommate ended up explaining a bit about social activism to me that year -- I didn't quite understand all of it, and at the time I was still living in a "the world is a pure meritocracy so long as you don't play the victim" mindset -- but thinking back, I am seeing how that experience revealed a pretty gaping flaw in my own thinking even if I didn't see it at the time.
I was so used to presuming that prejudice was "someone else's problem" (in the sense that I didn't need to do anything about it aside from proclaim it "wrong" where I saw it, unless of course it was directed at me, in which case I would actively fight it) that I could not see how my own attitudes could help perpetuate prejudice. I thought a person had to actually be prejudiced against one or more ethnic/cultural groups to be part of the prejudice problem, which of course left me off the hook.
Or so I thought.
It has only been through looking at how different people enjoy different levels of valuation and privilege that I've been able to realize that no, I am not off the hook. Even as I work, in whatever way I can, to help bolster the idea that being autistic (or otherwise disabled/atypical/different) should not disqualify a person from membership in the human community (with all the respect and ethical consideration that entails), and even as I acknowledge the unexamined, harmful assumptions regarding brains like mine and people like me, I must not lose sight of contexts where I am the one who needs to check my attitude.
Sure, I might get looked askance at by some due to my "odd" body language or fleeting eye contact or idiosyncratic, inconsistent use of language -- but in general, I don't have people making cracks within (or outside) earshot about how I and my family are probably "illegals" who ought to be deported.
In general, if I walk into a store, the clerks aren't looking at my skin color and raising their vigilance levels due to a perception that people who look like me tend to be thieves.
I don't constantly hear speculations about how people of my ancestral background are probably less intelligent, more aggressive, or less honest -- and that somehow "statistics show this, and anyone who doesn't believe it is just being PC".
I might hear other speculations, all of them equally misguided, but that doesn't make the ones that get applied to others and not me "not my problem"!
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


9 comments:
Great post. This gives me lots to think about and may help me articulate my position on discrimination.
I read opinions stating '"the world is a pure meritocracy so long as you don't play the victim" mindset' all the time. I've not had the words to challenge it but hope that now I will.
Thanks.
Hi Anne,
I came to your website via Ouroboros thinking I was walking into another Longevity website. Not that it would be a bad thing as I am very interested in longevity, but when I also found your "other" articles I was truly impressed by the simple complexity of your thoughts. (Yes, I know that sounds strange) Your take on discrimination is one in which most people who actually stop to think about how it all works would most likely end up agreeing with. I know I have, and I appreciate your ability to put it into words. It's a helpful approach to a very serious problem.
Thanks again,
Markus
Lovely post.
Sharon: Hello. Thanks for commenting - I have enjoyed your blog for some time now. You have some cool kids. :)
And re. the '"the world is a pure meritocracy so long as you don't play the victim" mindset'' thing -- I actually used to believe that was true myself. I would sometimes make excuses for mistakes and failures, but inwardly I always felt like I was probably just a horrible, selfish, lazy person who deserved whatever I got. What changed my mind about that was realizing that by thinking that way about myself, I ran the risk of applying the same mentality to other people, which seemed an obviously unfair thing to do once I thought about it. I could much more easily see how other people's difficulties were being caused (at least in part) by factors not under their control, and that when people were appropriately helped, they did not turn into lazy, demanding whiners.
It bugs me that so many people get stuck on the idea that either you have to believe everyone is on a level playing field to start (meaning that all their difficulties can be attributed to character flaws or "not trying hard enough"), or consider them to be helpless victims for whom help would be insulting and patronizing. IMO, that's a false dichotomy, as there are very obviously types of help that are completely acceptable to ask for and receive.
Oh, and as an addendum to my last comment: I also do think that there are kinds, and ways of offering help that are patronizing. But these should not be looked to as examples of what reasonable help should look like.
Markus: Hi - thanks for stopping by. Longevity is definitely a primary interest of mine, and I originally wrote about little else in this blog, but over time I started realizing that longevity was not just about how to achieve it, but about what happens while you're living it. (Gah, that sounds really corny and catch-phrasey, but hopefully you know what I am getting at!) Additionally, I kept finding that the subject of longevity intersected with all kinds of other things, which compelled me in turn to learn a bit more about those things, which then compelled me to write about what I learned. So while I do write about longevity specifically on a semi-regular basis, I have been pleased to see that this blog can handle additional topics as well, because there are a number of things I enjoy writing and learning about (as well as a number of things I want to communicate, which is weird, because I am really not accustomed to people actually being interested in what I have to say).
I was a bit concerned about potentially alienating readers when I started branching out topic-wise, but that doesn't seem to have happened -- and besides, pretty much everything I write here is stuff that I probably would have written anyway even if there weren't anywhere public to put it.
And re. discrimination (per the topic of my original post): my middle-class 1980s-1990s upbringing definitely exposed me to a lot of "discrimination is bad" messages, and I always found myself horrified by the accounts we read in history classes of slavery, segregation, etc. But like many of my era and socioeconomic background, I ended up with the "it's all in the past" mentality and was frankly shocked to find out that racism wasn't dead, in America or anywhere else.
And thanks for the compliments. :) I'm not sure what "simple complexity" means, but if it means you were able to understand my writing, I will be quite happy with that assessment.
Dale:
Thanks. (And I've been reading your posts with interest lately as well -- very glad you're back in blogging form during in time for the election season!)
"Even as I work, in whatever way I can, to help bolster the idea that being autistic (or otherwise disabled/atypical/different) should not disqualify a person from membership in the human community (with all the respect and ethical consideration that entails), and even as I acknowledge the unexamined, harmful assumptions regarding brains like mine and people like me, I must not lose sight of contexts where I am the one who needs to check my attitude."
This is so true. We all need to check our own attitudes on a regular basis.
You are mentioned in my latest post. You were an important part of our dinner conversation the other night!
Another thing I find interesting here is the interaction between two prejudices. You were expecting discrimination because you were autistic, her because she wasn't white. And until your discussion, you both viewed the situation through the lenses of two different kinds of discrimination, that painted two different people as the victim.
It reminds me of a story I heard where a claustrophobic white woman was at a thing where native americans were 'showing white people their culture'. When it came time for the sweat lodge ceremony, the woman said she might get scared during it and asked if she could leave partway through. She was told that she could, so she decided to try it. But during the ceremony, when she started getting scared, a (male) native elder told her she shouldn't leave, she was being disrespectful, etc. And they had an argument about it. The native people viewed it as 'white people disrespecting our elders' while the white woman thought of it as 'a man trying to force me to stay in a situation where I don't feel safe'.
Post a Comment