Lately, it has seemingly become quite a bit easier for me to locate information on (or an actual source for!) practically anything I get nostalgic about, which is a very weird feeling. I have a fairly thorough and detailed long-term memory for things that have a particular aesthetic to them, and there were a number of books, movies, songs, albums, stories, and objects that I lost or misplaced (or simply failed to record or preserve when I had the opportunity) that existed to me only in my brain for a number of years, to the point where I started to wonder if I'd dreamed some of them.
Perhaps the most prominent example of this was a short-run series on Nickelodeon called The Third Eye. For years and years, I recalled snippets of very eerie music in my mind, images of weird slimy lump-shaped aliens sliding through tunnels under the earth, and a vague notion of a small, impish-looking statue. But I couldn't find any information on the actual shows for years.
Then came the Internet, and message boards, and forums, and perhaps most importantly, search engines. By typing in weird words like "Grinnygog", I was able to reach information that both corroborated and filled in some of the gaps in my rememberances. I was fairly shocked when I found out how long ago the shows had actually aired -- judging from the dates I uncovered, I must have watched such shows when I was between the ages of maybe 3 and 7. And none of them had been released on video or DVD in the USA, so while I at least knew I hadn't dreamed them, I still didn't have any way to re-watch them. I've since found snippets here and there on Youtube and other online sources, and it has been a decidedly bizarre experience to see even small parts of media I'd thought was "lost".
Hopefully I don't sound like I'm over-romanticizing the Internet here or anything -- I'm well aware that most people in the world still don't have flushing toilets, let alone Net access. But there is something very affecting in the realization that I've been able to find pieces of things to confirm and refresh ancient, strange childhood memories as a result of a diffuse but highly-networked peer-to-peer community of individuals (determined to preserve and share their memories of the same things I'd thought were long forgotten).
Some people remember images and melodies and titles the way I did, others remember dates, others have access to old television schedules, and the very, very lucky ones might have crumbling old VHS tapes. In a different sort of world, perhaps these stories would truly have been lost, but in this world, it seems that enough people managed to hold their memories safely until the right sort of platform emerged through which to share and integrate them.
Applied this way, the Internet is a kind of collective scrapbook, and in that sense, there's a kind of beauty to it. Some people seem to view "technological development" as something that (justifiably, if you ask some folks) simply bulldozes the artifacts of the past, chopping them up into the raw stuff from which new things are sure to emerge. But it doesn't have to be looked at that way. I see innovation as additive and enriching, not as a "cleansing flame" set to wash the surface of the Earth anew for the shimmering sterility of crystal spires and togas.
Moving into a realm slightly shinier and more commercial than "pure" nostalgia-mining, I just purchased an MP3 album from Amazon for the first time: Queen II. I was completely obsessed with Queen in junior high and this was one of my absolute favorite albums of theirs...I was less enamored with the 80s stuff where they started getting all dance-y, but their 70s material was most excellently weird and dramatic and flouncy and technically interesting.
Queen II is especially interesting because a lot of the songs have a kind of fairy-tale-like theme in a tone/mindset that reminds me vaguely of the aesthetic of "Labyrinth" for some reason (which doesn't mean it sounds like David Bowie -- it doesn't, really, it's more like the music reminds me of the visual atmosphere of the movie). I remember listening to it in 7th and 8th grade and feeling like I'd discovered a kind of lost, dark, glittery treasure. There was always something about the early Queen albums that made me feel, at least as a kid, like I was listening in on something I perhaps wasn't supposed to hear -- like the soundtrack to someone else's dream, or the looking-glass version of a pop album from some parallel dimension that only intersects with ours every once in a while.
There are a number of songs on this album (like White Queen (As It Began) and (The Fairy-Feller's Master Stroke) that I've never heard played on the radio. In fact, I think the only song I've ever heard on the radio from this album is Seven Seas of Rhye, which is a pretty odd tune but which somehow ended up on at least one Greatest Hits albums.
I actually still have the cassette tape of Queen II, which means I also have the insert/liner notes, which is why I figured I would just purchase and download the MP3s. The MP3s, happily, seem to be "regular" MP3s that I can copy and transfer between different folders -- within a few minutes of clicking the "order" button, I had the whole album on my hard drive, on my iPod, and on the media server in my living room. Neat!
And now I'm sitting here with headphones on, grinning like a rather silly person and feeling weird little chills running up and down my spine as I recognize bits and pieces and threads of harmony and guitar and funny jingling noises that haven't entered my ears in close to a decade (I've not had a reliable cassette player in a while, and the tape itself was missing for several years).
As a child I did entertain plenty of daydreams involving jet packs, warp drive, and silver jumpsuits, mostly because those were the motifs of the pictures of "the future" I was given by my culture, but as I've gotten older, it has become clear to me that things are changing in a far less predictable and more organic-seeming manner than I imagined they would initially. I never imagined that I would be able to just think of an album I hadn't heard in a while, punch its specifications up on the screen, electronically transfer funds, and have the music flowing into my ears within the space of a few minutes.
In short: those who scour the world for minute trials in grand and desperate attempts to prove the existence of "magic" or paranormal ability are surely missing out on the real magic that is waking up in the world through the mechanisms of the almost-invisibly mundane.
I am not saying that "machines are going to save us all" and I am quite viscerally aware that only a tiny percentage of the world's population is currently privy to the "magic" of practically being able to wish any known object, verse, or song into their laps or ears almost instantaneously. And I do feel somewhat uneasy taking such delight in making the "magic" analogy when I don't know where the parts of my computer were made, or under what conditions.
But one of the things that actually gives me hope for the future is that in some respects, and in some contexts, at least some people are seeing how the old and the new can coexist uniquely and vibrantly. The new is not consuming or destroying the old, but maintaining a sense of the preciousness of things (even "frivolous"-seeming things like weird British childrens' TV shows), and seeking to bring them into the future in such a way that more people can enjoy them. I like to think that this odd, infrequently-discussed subset of communication and information-sharing is a poetic microcosm of a particular approach to progress I quite favor -- and that is the approach in which it is recognized that the future has room for practically anything one can imagine, regardless of age.
Friday, February 29, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


15 comments:
A very interesting post.
I am far too young to have experienced anything like what you're describing, and my experience with the internet has been somewhat less gratifying (I have been looking for a volleyball term for a specific kind of set for close to ten months now, with no success beyond the place where I originally read about the term).
On the other hand, one night when my parents were talking about old TV shows they watched when they were kids (in the 50's and 60's), my Mum, a librarian, hopped online and found a website devoted to oldies children shows. It was both amusing and occasionally a little creepy. ;)
Oh, I'm happy to see that Anne is a Queen fan, too!
I was as hardcore a fanatic from the age of 14 to, say, 20 as you can imagine. Accidentally, Queen's "Flash Gordon" soundtrack was the first record I ever bought. But then I really immersed myself in their world with the Complete Works box set which had 14 vinyl LPs. I'm probably an exception insofar as Queen as a studio project was always much more important than Queen the live band. I think they dumbed down their music with those gargantuan arena shows of, especially, the 80s.
My favorite song of Queen II was for a long time "March of The Black Queen". I particularly liked that passage around the line "Put them in the cellar with the naughty boys" where all those off-kilter choirs culminate to exhilarating effect.
FrF
I don't know if you'd be interested in this or not, but there is an interesting Japanese Manga/Anime called Gunslinger Girl, which is about a group of girls who were at one point in their lives on the verge of death. But then the government (Italy) took over custody of them from their parents, and gave them these implants that granted them full health, enhanced strength and reflexes, and increased tolerance and threshold for pain and damage.
The girls were then given a "handler", a man, who trained them, looked after their welfare, and accompanied on their "missions", because these girls were basically turned into miniature assassins. Part of their "training" was something called conditioning, which was brainwashing to the point that the girl had %100 blind loyalty to their handler. So, you have these astonishingly strong little girls (pre-pubescent) who were sharpshooters and unquestionably derferent to their handlers to the point that they wre basically in love with them
It's a very dark show, but it brings up a lot of interesting questions, so I thought I'd run it by you (Wikipedia has a good entry on it).
kakalina:
The thing your parents are describing re. the old TV shows -- yeah, that's exactly the kind of thing I'm talking about in my post. It IS amusing and a bit creepy -- part of it feels like when you think a character in a story is dead and you've sort of come to terms with them being dead, but then you find out that they are still alive. It's a weird, neat feeling.
I had sort of half-resigned myself to some of the shows I recalled from a long time ago having been "lost to history" but I was wrong, and it's fascinating how people with little bits and pieces of recollection (or film, or old tapes) are piecing all that together and managing to re-create the original entity to some extent.
And regarding the anime you mention (Gunslinger Girl) -- I haven't seen or read that one, but it does sound pretty interesting. I am actually quite an anime geek though it's not the main thing I write about online -- it just seems like anime dips into a lot of themes that Western stuff either doesn't touch or doesn't prioritize as important. The first "serious" anime I saw was Neon Genesis Evangelion -- it was funny because I had a t-shirt showing some of the characters from the show, that I'd gotten long before I even knew the show existed (I got the shirt because I liked it and didn't even know it had anything to do with a show in the first place).
And someone in my math class turned out to be in the school anime club and saw my shirt and commented on it, and subsequently was shocked I hadn't seen the series. He let me borrow a video tape of the first few episodes, and I was so blown away by it (since I'd never seen ANYTHING animated that intense before) that I eventually ended up getting all the DVDs. There was a lot of material in there about power and control and definitions of what "life" is, and the ethics of experimentation and warfare and weird quasi-boundaries between good and evil...I know now that series isn't even the most intense one out there, but it was my first exposure to certain ideas that I now think about quite often.
Some of what you're describing about Gunslinger Girl sort of reminds me of the movie "The Professional", which also included a little girl being trained as an assassin. I found that movie compelling but highly disturbing in some respects -- in this case the girl wanted to be trained as an assassin, because she'd basically had her life saved by a guy who was one, which I think made her kind of romanticize the whole thing. Weird stuff, but definitely interesting.
Franz: Yep, I'm very much a Queen fan, though I'd not listened much to them since I started primarily getting my music on CD (almost all my Queen albums are on cassette tape). My favorite albums of theirs are still "Queen II" and "A Night At The Opera". And I totally agree with regard to appreciating Queen as a "studio band" moreso than an "arena rock" band -- you're not a complete exception! I think the studio setting really allowed them to experiment more and just geek out with audio equipment and track overlays, with brilliant results. I sort of wish they'd done more of that, since they were so darned good at it.
Early Queen seems almost like classical composition, where the composer sort of visualizes different parts in their head and then "engineers" them together to create something multidimensional and wonderful. I really, really like that kind of thing, and frankly before I got into Queen I'd not been very interested in "rock" at all: if you'd asked me what my favorite musical style was when I was 11 years old, I'd have said "classical". My favorite song in grade school for a long time was "Tocatta and Fugue in D Minor" by Bach (though I was also fond of some of my parents' 80s record singles like "Safety Dance" by Men Without Hats), and I was also obsessed with Star Wars and its symphonic theme music.
I haven't actually heard the Flash Gordon soundtrack -- the albums I own (on cassette, CD, MP3) are Queen II, A Night At The Opera, Sheer Heart Attack, News of the World, and Queen's Greatest Hits (the navy-blue one and the maroon one). I've also got some miscellaneous tapes with songs on them that I randomly recorded from the radio that are from other albums, but not much of that. And I've seen Highlander and heard the songs from that film, some of which are kind of fun. But truly, the stuff I'm a Major Fan of happened prior to 1980 -- I love the bombastic dark fantasy vibe of Queen II more than words can express. :D
Anne, I don't see "A Day At The Races", the companion album to "A Night At The Opera", on your list. You should get it and maybe "Jazz", too. Both records won't enrich your picture of Queen dramatically but complete it nicely. Especially "A Day At The Races" has some fine songs: "You Take My Breath Away", another extravaganza of layered harmonies by Freddie and "Long Away", a quasi-folk-song by Brian May. John Deacon's tender "In Only Seven Days" from "Jazz" is also great.
You may like "Flash Gordon", though it's slight in terms of quantity. (I doubt that the whole record amounts to 30 minutes without the dialogue snippets from the movie.) There are, however, some good, to use your phrase, pre-dancey instrumental tracks. Unfortunately the charmingly wacky pulp commentary "Flash Gordon" is as far from hard SF as it is possible :-)
There's this well-known anecdote that Queen did so much overdubs on their second album that they physically wore down the recording tape until they could see through it! It isn't hard to believe this actually happened when one listens to Queen II.
FrF
Thanks, Franz, for the recommendations. I have actually heard "A Day At The Races" -- I just don't personally own it. And "You Take My Breath Away" is definitely a standout track. I'm going to poke around at the used CD store today (well, they sell new CDs too but I usually check the used racks first because I'm cheap like that), though, so if I see it I will pick it up.
Oh, and on the subject of complex, highly "crafted" music, another album that has wowed me recently is Ys by Joanna Newsom. Some people find her voice extremely irritating, but I really like it for some reason, and the musical arrangements (and lyrics) on Ys have a wonderful sweeping fantastical quality to them.
I like Joanna Newsom, too.
For those you don't know her latest album, the NYT has a complete MP3 of "Emily" as supplementary to its Newsom profile*.
I think I like the equally expansive "Monkey & Bear" more than "Emily", though :-)
And there was an "epic-length" article about Newsom in an older issue of the esoteric Arthur Magazine. The profile starts on page 12 of pdf file no. 1.
* Link should work for non-registered users.
FrF
I saw a comment you made on Autism Vox's post in regards to money. Our daughter has really struggled with learning about money. You mentioned your parents helped you a lot with money skills as a child. Can you remember anything different that they did to help you? I would love some tips in regards to teaching my daughter money skills, an area very very difficult for her.
I too love having the internet to verify old memories from films, cartoons, etc. Often, when we are watching a movie we will look up what a certain actor has been in before rather than being unbale to sleep wondering.
Hi Marla -- I started typing you a reply (regarding money and how I learned to deal with it), but it got really long so I figured I would email it to you. So I sent you an email...I have a yahoo address so if you don't see something from me in your inbox soon, you might want to check your bulk folder.
Insightful and eloquently put as always Anne, especially the concluding paragraph. "The more abstract the truth you want to teach, the more thoroughly you must seduce the senses to accept it." Have you ever read Nietzsche? He is by far the most entertaining (though certainly not the wisest) philosopher I have ever read.
Please check out my website when you have the chance: alexandrianphilosophy.org
Hey Anne,
I just recently stumbled upon you and your blog (via WTA BoD) and I must say I really like your attitude and your view on many things. Can't share your optimism all the time (how are you doing that?), but will try my best, and your optimistic stand is infecting (i need more of that stuff ;-)
In priciple i agree with you on many topics (although i'm still working on myself to make my reality of life fitting better with my theoretical views and oppinions).
I would appreciate to hear more podcasts from you, are you planning to go on with some recordings?
I also would like to thank you for mentioning Joanna Newsom in the comments: after a longer term the first really great artist i discovered. she's so wonderful, genius. Reminds me on Björk. Maybe you want to try her (first?) album, Walnut Whales, too. Sounds not as professional as Ys, but especially the first two tracks are just...ehm...perfect.
That's all I wanted to say for the moment. Keep on going well, and try to ignore my bumpy english ;-)
For a lack of a better place to comment, I'm posting it here.
Did you hear about the recent case about Hannah Poling (I think that's her name) who reportedly developed autism-like symptoms after a bout of vaccines she was given back in 2000? The Federal Court has ordered reparations to the family for this, and there is much concern in many organizations that various groups of people who believe that vaccines are the cause for Autism will point their fingers at this case as evidence (*hmph* they're just looking for some scapegoat to sue). I'm sure that you've been keeping close tabs on the case, but I thought that I'd mention it.
I'm having fun reading the comments on this post ;)
kakalina: Regarding Hannah Poling: to me it sounds like she was born with a rare mitochondrial disorder, and was eventually diagnosed with a form of encepalopathy (which basically just means "brain malfunction", at least according to Wikipedia) that may have been exacerbated by a post-vaccination fever.
So, to me, it sounds like a case where a kid with a pre-existing physical issue experienced behavioral and neurological(?) changes after a fever.
I don't get how people are acting as if this incident represents some kind of breakthrough or "victory" for the antivaxers. There's nothing new or revolutionary about either the idea that some people might be vulnerable to vaccines, or that some people end up getting compensated for supposed adverse effects. Payouts have been made to various families in the past by the Vaccine Injury Compensation fund, which was established both to assure adequate vaccine supply and distribution, and address situations in which individuals may be experiencing adverse vaccine reactions.
Heck, even the CDC (considered the "evil empire" by some) has a list of vaccine contraindications on their website -- that is, they actually list groups of people for whom vaccines may cause adverse reactions, such as persons with severely compromised immune systems. All medicine represents a certain degree of risk, and as far as medical interventions and preventative measures go, vaccines are pretty darn safe as compared to a lot of other things. And they're certainly a heck of a lot safer than things like measles, polio, and whooping cough.
So, basically, I don't have any problem believing that yes, this girl might have ended up with brain changes after experiencing a post-vaccination fever, or that people with rare mitochondrial disorders might be especially vulnerable to fevers and immune reactions. There's nothing particularly weird or "shocking" about that, or about the fact that the child in question here started exhibiting "autistic-like features" following her post-vaccine illness (especially since practically anything out of the behavioral norm seems to be getting chalked up to "autism" these days -- have you read about the studies on mice where the researchers attempted to claim that "excessive grooming to the point of drawing blood" meant that the mice were autistic?).
But it's a HUGE (and inappropriate) stretch to do what some people are attempting, which seems to range from claiming that this incident "proves" a vaccine-autism link to claiming that "autism should be reclassified as a mitochondrial disorder". The media coverage of this incident has been utterly dreadful.
(This reminds me, though, I really need to make a post one of these days on what I think "autistic" actually means...for now I will say that I think it has a lot more to do with how people perceive, process, and learn than what they appear like on the surface, or what things they can or cannot do at any particular point in time. But it's a lot harder to test for and quantify "how" than "what", which is why I am very pleased to see people studying autistic cognition since cognitive science is very much attuned to the idea that how people perceive and approach and think about situations and problems is extremely important with regard to understanding the brain and all its diverse manifestations.)
Post a Comment