Amazingly (to me), I still encounter people every so often who ask this question. It comes up in various different contexts: sometimes when I've been nattering on excitedly about life extension research, and sometimes just in the goings-on of daily life. And it never fails to take me aback. Regardless of what has been going on in my life (and believe me, it isn't always sunshine, kittens, and roses), the value of existence has never been something I've questioned.
I've questioned its meaning on many occasions, and I went through the requisite adolescent existential crisis, but the inherent worth of existence, particularly conscious existence, seems self-evident to me. Even on my moodiest day as a teenager, I still had an intense and unquestionable sense that being was something so precious and exquisite that it needed to be acknowledged and experienced through as many means as possible, for as long as possible.
None of this has anything to do with any sort of supernatural belief, nor does it necessitate a view of reality than anthropomorphizes the universe-at-large and assigns it the intents and appetites of (relatively speaking) newly-sentient hairless apes. Rather, it simply means that even in the absence of benevolent (or malevolent) creator entities, and even if life does not have some sort of disembodied "meaning" out there floating around waiting to be discovered by enlightened primates or the machines we eventually construct, there are still innumerable things that make existence a wholly worthwhile endeavor.
The raw materials wrought by and through space and time, the intricate interactions of forces and feedback, the evolved entity that is the imagination -- all these things together comprise a superstructure of potential and complexity of a sort that needs nothing but its very existence to prove its worth.
This superstructure is what I see in the drawing of every breath, in the shifting of every glance, in every moonlight dash out into the driveway to breathlessly take in snatches of constellation and frost-hued air. It is the first thing that greets me when the alarm blares in the morning, and the last thing that hangs before me like a camera-flash afterimage before I fall into sleep every night.
I do not live my life according to a checklist. Well, that's not exactly true -- I do make use of daily to-do lists, and I've gone through more than my share of sticky notes in this endeavor. But that's not the kind of checklist I am referring to here. Rather, I am referring to the kind of checklist that goes something like this: you're born, you grow into a small child, you play in particular ways, you go to school, you go to the prom, you find a mate and get married, you join a company and advance through the ranks, you eventually retire, you plan for your funeral, and finally, you die.
Though life-extensionists are frequently reminded of the fact that many people find moral fault in any expressed desire to thwart the enemy at the end, perhaps fewer are viscerally aware of just how pervasive the life-script checklist can be in a culture. This life-script manifests itself in numerous areas (from play to school to career to lifestyle in general), and people's reactions to those who deviate from it can be curiously hostile.
I started becoming aware of this hostility at a fairly early age, when it became evident to me that I was frequently the only female in any group of my age-peers who made a beeline for the spaceships and construction toys. I remember being literally chased down by a group of girls my age when I was eleven years old, who were determined to give me a "makeover".
I never found it particularly difficult to resist peer pressure, but for people without the kind of brain wiring that gives me that kind of resistance, I can see how it can be problematic when your strong interest in things your peers don't care about can mean you'll end up playing alone most of the time. Similarly, I have to wonder how many people might avoid learning more about longevity research because they fear that even if they themselves find a way to treat the health decline associated with their own old age, their friends will not follow suit (or more immediately, that their friends will dismiss their desire to live as long as possible as hubris or self-importance).
While I understand that social pressures can be very real for many, I don't really see how any social pressure can override permanently the sheer force by which the, well, wonderfulness of existence reveals itself at all levels of awareness that can be conceived of as awareness. It is my hope that somehow, perhaps, over time I might be able to contribute toward helping more people see this wonderfulness.
It's all around everyone, everywhere, all the time.
It is not to be found in ultimate fame or fortune or even security.
Rather, it is in the slide of cool sheets on a breezy summer evening, in the crunch of a raspberry seed, in the feeling of soaring as you find a mirror of your own inner workings in art or algorithm.
It is in the trees, it is in the gas giants, in the nebulae, in a future wrought of laughter and imagination and intent.
It is in the rising and falling of breath and in the whirring of machines, and in the careful construction of artificial neurons in a vast database in a large, cold room.
It is in the eyes of a cat and the musk of new-cut grass.
It is in the domes and spires of ancient cities, and of cities wrought in silicon and mind alone.
It is in the outdoors, in the cellular membranes of everything alive.
It is in the Internet and, it is in music.
It is so pervasive and so utterly, indescribably beautiful that words can scarcely wrap themselves around it.
This is why I seek to be alive: to continue to have (and be) a particular pattern in spacetime of a sort capable of experiencing a sense of the shifting and yearning of the superstructure of reality.
Humans have long constructed art and media in ways that represent dwarfed microcosms of the life-script: books and songs and symphonies characterized by exposition, climax, denouement, and end.
But now: imagine films one hundred years long, or books that are written as a kind of joyous and constant exposition -- not punctuated by a single megaclimax, but by millions upon millions of such events.
Imagine poems of such depth and complexity that nobody younger than one thousand can understand their secrets.
While the loveliness and significance of the earliest of human accomplishments in media and science cannot be denied, a future of long-lived consciousnesses could bring with it not only art-forms that mimic the structures of the past, but new configurations that challenge and delight sensory and contemplative experience in ways we can only guess at now. In order to do this wonderful existence a scant percentage of the justice it deserves, we need to run the experiment.
6 comments:
Sad that there are no intrinsic mechanisms in us that make us experience existence as wonderful.
Well, I seem to have those intrinsic mechanisms, as do at least a few other people I've encountered. I also think that to some extent, individuals can learn to adjust their attitude so as to allow them to experience more "wonderfulness" -- whether through thought exercises, meditation, or even medication (as in the case of clinical depression).
Existence usually beats the alternative.
Ted Chiang in the preface to his rather good story of an emerging superintelligence, titled "Understand," relates how he got the idea for this story:
The initial impulse to write "Understand" arose from an offhand remark made by my roommate in college; he was reading Sartre's Nausea at the time, whose protagonist finds only meaninglessness in everything he sees. But what would it be like, my roommate wondered, to find meaning and order in everything you saw? To me that suggested a kind of heightened perception, which in turn suggested superintelligence. I started thinking about the point at which quantitative improvements -- better memory, faster pattern recognition -- turn into a qualitative difference, a fundamentally different mode of cognition.
So, how would it feel like always to find "meaning and order in everything you saw"? I've had glimpses of that experience, but I want to get to that state full time. I think you express a similar sentiment.
So, how would it feel like always to find "meaning and order in everything you saw"?
Well, I feel like this most of the time, though I would certainly not presume to call myself a superintelligence!
This is an interesting idea (that of finding "meaning and order in everything") in that it makes me wonder about the difference between actual meaning and projected meaning.
I do take the viewpoint that the universe is patently absurd and that any meaning we experience in our lives is necessarily due to an active process of creating that meaning -- however, at the same time, it does seem that there are different "degrees of validity" to different types of meaning-finding.
For example, a person might experience a strong sense of "meaningfulness" when solving a difficult equation for the first time, or noticing how light scatters on the wall as it emerges from the apertures in a crocheted blanket, or when grasping the dizzying magnitude of just how long it took for humans to evolve from micro-organisms. These are examples of things I'd consider to have "high validity" in terms of their ability to generate meaningful subjective experiences.
However, people who are paranoid or experiencing apophenia can also experience a sense of connectedness and meaningfulness in certain events -- but this sense of meaningfulness is what I'd term "low validity" in that it makes claims about reality which can generally be falsified through application of the scientific method (though not necessarily to the satisfaction of the paranoid!)
I haven't spent a whole lot of time thinking through how to word this, so it might be coming out rather clumsily, but I guess the point I am trying to make is that though the universe might not be imposing a meaning upon sentient beings (therefore leaving us free to find our own), there's a difference between finding (and appreciating) the beauty and complexity of existence, and in positing claims of connectedness that relate in some way to what is generally thought of as objective reality.
Put in even simpler terms, the kind of "finding meaning" I value is more the sort in which a person can get a sense of awe from pondering the movement of electrons in a wire -- not the sort in which a person thinks that a helicopter flying overhead means that someone is spying on them.
Sounds like you're describing what the Buddhists call mindfulness -- a feeling of being completely connected to one's surroundings, even simple things like a raspberry seed.
And yeah, those life-script checklists are awful. I often have an urge to throw something at the TV when I see those financial advisor commercials that assume everyone wants nothing more than to retire and sail off into the sunset.
abfh: It was about 8 years ago that I realized that I was probably seeing the world differently than most people, and when I went looking for some information on "observing reality" (or something along those lines) I found a site about mindfulness. And I posted a very exuberant and CAPS-PUNCTUATED message on that site.
I just think it's funny it's still there.
And I should clarify that my reference in that old post to "getting lost in everyday experience" actually meant something like what I'm referring to now as the "life script" -- the thing where everyone is expected to live their lives according to the same kind of checklist, and that seems to bring with it a sort of numbness and propensity toward gossiping about celebrities and watching lots of television.
Post a Comment